regarding the recent and previous swarms of large drones over Jersey and elsewhere around the world... who do you think they are?
some good videos are out like Weaponized by Corbell/Knapp and NewsNation w/Ross Coulthart
obviously the US knows the answer, they just ain't sayin...
* please try to treat this more like the Reading Room, not No-Holds Barred.
Prohibition is Futile THC will be Assimilated ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ How To Pass Drug Tests ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one. -Albert Einstein
there are many shorter videos out there with much more footage... but these guys aren't your average dummies, imho.
the truth is out there, and it's about to get real.
Prohibition is Futile THC will be Assimilated ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ How To Pass Drug Tests ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one. -Albert Einstein
These swarms of drones seem to have brought with them a swarm of questions.
1. who's are they?
I guess with the usage of drones in the war of UKR/RUS, other countries are scrambling to match RUS's capabilities to deploy them.
Most to the sightings are US and UK, both being the stronger of the Western Alliance's military powers. They would certainly be desiring to at least be able to launch as effective drone usage as the country they are at war with. Maybe we are witnessing tests on new technology.
2. What energy source are they using?
Batteries would be my guess, unless some micro nuclear power capability has been developed. This would mean that the drones are launching from a base local to where they are being sighted. I'm thinking 2 hours or so would be the average life of the best batteries, but my knowledge is limited as to what the military possesses in this department.
3. Why the lights?
Certainly the lights aren't for seeing where they are going. I'm sure they have geo trackers built in like smartphones and always know exact location and destination coordinates. So the lights in my opinion are meant for them to be seen from a distance. The two guys in one video say they can't even be seen with the naked eye, although obviously some of them are or we wouldn't have "sightings".
4. Are they terrestrial or extra terrestrial?
I'm leaning towards terrestrial, because they would be more like orbs if ET sent. And again, why the lights. The one that hovered off the ground at the UK airport is the exception, as it seemed to defy gravity...Gyroteck?
So an alien civilisation so far advance it has developed inter-stellar travel can't even hide itself from a bunch of glorified apes on planet earth eh?
If there are aliens observing us, they sure as hell would know how to hide from us.
As usual, humans are so fucking dumb they think the aliens are as stupid as us. But if we can anthropomorphise a stupid, petty god, we can do the same to civilisations so intelligent they make us looks like bacteria in the grand scheme of evolution.
i really dono how to vote.
really hard to say. maybe like the balloons a few years ago.
My therapist says I am a habitual liar and an attention seeker, therefore nothing I say/write is true and under no circumstances should I be believed nor held accountable for anything I say. all photo's are paintings
People are born with the instinct to fight against their own death, to struggle with their last breath against even the most unavoidable and uncompromising ends.
you can change your votes if & when desired. it seems that there are pros and cons to each possibility, but the biggest question is why are they not trying to hide, or why would they actually want to be seen? this may point towards either Russia or a false flag, making an intentional spectacle, except that as the videos explain, this has actually been going on for decades in many different areas, even over Russia and China, and often fitting this description and having bright lights. why would the US say they are no cause for alarm, indicating they know something they aren't telling us, unless they belong to the US as a false flag operation? if they were training, why would they be doing it over populated areas with non-standard lighting, and not admitting to it? but they also may not want to announce an adversary being responsible as it could amount to an act of war, and they might be responding this way as if to say we are just not afraid of them. or if they announced that they're NHI, that would be admitting inability to control our airspace and an unpredictable lack of safety. there have been only a couple reports of them going dark are when spot-lighted, perhaps using laser, which could trigger a self-defensive stealth mode. but keep in mind that these are not hobby drones, comparable to $30,000 industrial models, designed to carry a payload, and with extended flight-times, but still apparently limited to about 5 hours or so, and indeed are much more similar to human tech than otherwise. they were also reported to be coming from off-shore, likely from a ship or a sub. it was also reported that an Iranian "drone-ship" is out there, or not, but wouldn't it be typical of the US to point to an adversary they would prefer to attack, rather than the real culprit? i know the videos are long, but they do explain quite a bit of fascinating info.
Prohibition is Futile THC will be Assimilated ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ How To Pass Drug Tests ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one. -Albert Einstein