the who the fuck is vs trump now

[Butcher Bob]

Just spit-balling here...
Maybe a Kamala Harris/Hillary Clinton ticket?
...and then shortly after the election Kamala has a fatal "accident".

[Lrus007]

funny i thought the same bob. then the weapon ban after.

[Butcher Bob]

Now that they got rid of that clown...



Kamala, she's the ticket...

She's been working at this all along...making the calls...



...trying to feel out the opponents...



But the Don is on to her as her plans unfold...



And yes, let's take a look at a couple of those poll predictions.

Here's one that has her losing 177 to 361...



Here's another that has her losing 177 to 361 as well...



BUT, is there a wrench in the works?
AOC seems to think so...



Well, on with the show...

[Lrus007]

well read the plan B today.

Video surfaced Monday of a panel discussion in February 2024 in which Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) speculated that Congress would have to invalidate an election victory by former President Donald Trump — at the risk of “civil war.”

It is not clear whether Raskin was actually outlining a plan of action, or rather using a hypothetical to argue that the U.S. Supreme Court was placing what he considered an undue burden on Congress to keep Trump out of office.

Raskin led the House impeachment managers in Trump’s second trial, accusing him of trying to overturn the 2020 election. He also served on the January 6 Committee, though he himself objected to the election results in 2017.

In the video, which was filmed at the Politics and Prose bookstore in Washington, D.C. on February 17, 2024, Raskin predicted that the Supreme Court would block Democrats’ efforts to exclude Trump from the ballot in several states on the basis of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, and would instead say that Congress had that responsibility.

Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted after the Civil War to bar former Confederates from holding federal office. Trump-haters on both the left and the right tried to argue that Trump had committed “insurrection” under the language of that section, and therefore was barred from running for president again.

Several Democratic states excluded Trump from primary election ballots until the Supreme Court — unanimously — ruled against them in March, holding that Congress is responsible for enforcing Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, and not the states.

Raskin went on to say that given the likely Supreme Court ruling, Congress would hypothetically have to take matters into its own hands, in the event that Trump won the election, triggering “civil war conditions” (emphasis added — see 58:39 in the video below):

the greatest example going on right now before our very eyes is Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which they’re just disappearing with a magic wand, as if it doesn’t exist, even though it could not be clearer what it’s stating. And so they want to kick it to Congress, so it’s going to be up to us on January 6, 2025, to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he’s disqualified. And then we need bodyguards for everybody, and civil war conditions, all because the nine justices — not all of them, but these justices who have not many cases to look at every year, not that much work to do, a huge staff, great protection — simply do not want to do their job and interpret what the great Fourteenth Amendment means.

yup by hook or crook... then blame someone else... this shit happens would be a civil war, they seem to want that.

[dill786]

Just spit-balling here...
Maybe a Kamala Harris/Hillary Clinton ticket?
...and then shortly after the election Kamala has a fatal "accident".

fucking anyone but hilary Clinton please....