Since that has failed then there's no reason for Putin to stay in Ukraine. wait he's still in Ukraine guess that wasn't be the reason.
Putin's invasion of Ukraine had nothing to do with Ukraine joining NATO. Other than as bogus rationalization to convince the weak minded.
Meanwhile:
The Dutch Air Force said goodbye to their F-16s, today they flew for the last time over the Netherlands. Then they will be transferred to the balance sheet of the Air Force of Ukraine
https://x.com/Azovsouth/status/1839714620048847111
UKRAINE & EU v RUSSIA part 2
-
Intrinsic
- Advanced Grower
-
Karma Hippie
- Has bestowed Karma : 2191 times
- Received Karma : 1814 times
- Posts: 8220
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:51 am
-
Butcher Bob
- Karma Monster
- Has bestowed Karma : 1362 times
- Received Karma : 1013 times
- Posts: 4435
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:18 am
-
ben ttech
- MPG Ambassador
-
Karma Hippie
- Custom Title: godisnotwhite.com
- Has bestowed Karma : 431 times
- Received Karma : 311 times
- Posts: 8444
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 2:22 am
UKRAINE & EU v RUSSIA part 2
Putin invasion of Ukraine had everything to do with their attempt to join nato
Between that and intervening in ukraines civil war and denazification on the fetter place their westerners had wrought.
Christ inc your out to lunch on this one…
Between that and intervening in ukraines civil war and denazification on the fetter place their westerners had wrought.
Christ inc your out to lunch on this one…
"disaster is the mother of necessity" rSin
-
Intrinsic
- Advanced Grower
-
Karma Hippie
- Has bestowed Karma : 2191 times
- Received Karma : 1814 times
- Posts: 8220
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:51 am
It's about resources stupid
Oh yeah big bad NATO. Russian was really scared of a defensive Force. he was only worried nato would interfere with his plans of territorial Conquest.
And I suppose NATO explains the invasion of Crimea too .. oh that's right u think Crimea was never invaded. Afterwards Russia was forced to invade Ukraine to turn the water back on else using desalination plants thier Naval Port was unsustainable .
Also you should go back and read smokebreak's post about importance for Russia controlling ukrainian coastline. Which putin did as #1 priorty.
NATO Sheesh
And I suppose NATO explains the invasion of Crimea too .. oh that's right u think Crimea was never invaded. Afterwards Russia was forced to invade Ukraine to turn the water back on else using desalination plants thier Naval Port was unsustainable .
Also you should go back and read smokebreak's post about importance for Russia controlling ukrainian coastline. Which putin did as #1 priorty.
NATO Sheesh
-
Prawn Connery
- MPG Founder
-
Karma Bhudda
- Has bestowed Karma : 476 times
- Received Karma : 582 times
- Posts: 2865
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 9:10 pm
UKRAINE & EU v RUSSIA part 2
Putin's cock > 
< Putin's boyfriend's cock
........................^ Ben
< Putin's boyfriend's cock........................^ Ben
Licensed to Krill
-
ben ttech
- MPG Ambassador
-
Karma Hippie
- Custom Title: godisnotwhite.com
- Has bestowed Karma : 431 times
- Received Karma : 311 times
- Posts: 8444
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 2:22 am
UKRAINE & EU v RUSSIA part 2
if putin wanted ukranian territory he'd have taken it 20 years ago when it would have been a cake walk
8 years ago before we armed their nazi fucks to the teeth
6 years ago when those fucks were bombing the donbass and luhansk cuz they wouldnt rename all their citys and street rivers and mountains
had russian names the nazi fucks insisted were thrown out
your running with the most idiotic story ive ever seen a grown man insist on believing.
you two are downright embarrassments.
8 years ago before we armed their nazi fucks to the teeth
6 years ago when those fucks were bombing the donbass and luhansk cuz they wouldnt rename all their citys and street rivers and mountains
had russian names the nazi fucks insisted were thrown out
your running with the most idiotic story ive ever seen a grown man insist on believing.
you two are downright embarrassments.
"disaster is the mother of necessity" rSin
-
Intrinsic
- Advanced Grower
-
Karma Hippie
- Has bestowed Karma : 2191 times
- Received Karma : 1814 times
- Posts: 8220
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:51 am
UKRAINE & EU v RUSSIA part 2
Russia territorial Conquest
Finland
Moldova
Estonia
Kyrgyzstan
Georgia
Abkhazia
Kuril Islands,
Crimea
In Continuing the Conquest tradition:
Donetsk
Luhansk
Kherson
Zaporizhzhia
And we now know the invasion of Ukraine hasn't anything to do with freeing the oppression of the Donetsk et al regions. The people are worse off, their cities are bombed into Oblivion, survivors are forced to speak Russian, become Russian , their male population devastated, recruited/died into Putin's invasion. All this after declaring them "independent". Whatta joke. Independent sheesh
Magnitudes worse than the Ukraine government.
And We Know It has nothing to do with NATO since the longer Putin stays in Ukraine the stronger NATO becomes. So if Putin wanted to reduce the precieved threat of nato he would leave Ukraine, the fact that he hasn't demonstrates it had absolutely nothing to do with NATO's growing influence since his invasion precipitates it. Not reduces.
We now know it had to do a territorial grab because that's all putin done.
He didn't kill Nazis, he didn't free the people of the Dontask regions or reduce NATO "encroachment", in fact russia now has NATO (Finland 2023) right up against his border because of his invasion .
Finland
Moldova
Estonia
Kyrgyzstan
Georgia
Abkhazia
Kuril Islands,
Crimea
In Continuing the Conquest tradition:
Donetsk
Luhansk
Kherson
Zaporizhzhia
And we now know the invasion of Ukraine hasn't anything to do with freeing the oppression of the Donetsk et al regions. The people are worse off, their cities are bombed into Oblivion, survivors are forced to speak Russian, become Russian , their male population devastated, recruited/died into Putin's invasion. All this after declaring them "independent". Whatta joke. Independent sheesh
Magnitudes worse than the Ukraine government.
And We Know It has nothing to do with NATO since the longer Putin stays in Ukraine the stronger NATO becomes. So if Putin wanted to reduce the precieved threat of nato he would leave Ukraine, the fact that he hasn't demonstrates it had absolutely nothing to do with NATO's growing influence since his invasion precipitates it. Not reduces.
We now know it had to do a territorial grab because that's all putin done.
He didn't kill Nazis, he didn't free the people of the Dontask regions or reduce NATO "encroachment", in fact russia now has NATO (Finland 2023) right up against his border because of his invasion .
-
Butcher Bob
- Karma Monster
- Has bestowed Karma : 1362 times
- Received Karma : 1013 times
- Posts: 4435
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:18 am
It's about resources stupid
Yes, the road to NATO membership was paved with the Maidan Coup, orchestrated by then Vice President Biden, then National Security Advisor to the Vice President Jake Sullivan, then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, then Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland, and then Deputy National Security Advisor Antony Blinken, using the CIA...
...which then directly resulted in the loss of Crimea immediately following the coup.
This info is repeatedly brought to your attention, and you always seem to forget...
...maybe you should see a doctor aboot your apparent memory loss.
Oh really?...
3:05-5:50
Umm, what did he just say?...
"Two days before the invasion, Kamala Harris went to Germany and said definitively for the first time by any US leader, we are moving NATO into Ukraine."
In the corner you go...
-
ben ttech
- MPG Ambassador
-
Karma Hippie
- Custom Title: godisnotwhite.com
- Has bestowed Karma : 431 times
- Received Karma : 311 times
- Posts: 8444
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 2:22 am
UKRAINE & EU v RUSSIA part 2
finland???
their IN nato now i guess you missd.
in EVERY other case Russia moved to nix OUR covert AGENCIES fomenting a HOSTILE takeover of that country!!!
russia is the GOOD ACTOR in every one of these cases.
and in NONE off them has russia HELD onto territory.
jeez
their IN nato now i guess you missd.
in EVERY other case Russia moved to nix OUR covert AGENCIES fomenting a HOSTILE takeover of that country!!!
russia is the GOOD ACTOR in every one of these cases.
and in NONE off them has russia HELD onto territory.
jeez
"disaster is the mother of necessity" rSin
-
Intrinsic
- Advanced Grower
-
Karma Hippie
- Has bestowed Karma : 2191 times
- Received Karma : 1814 times
- Posts: 8220
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:51 am
UKRAINE & EU v RUSSIA part 2
Finland had to ceded 9% of its territory from yet another unprovoked Russian invasion.
No I didn't miss finland's in NATO now. It was part of my point, go back and read my post, there it is "(Finland 2023)". Demonstrating if Putin's goal was stopping NATO's encroachment then Putin is a failure. And Putin is not a failure.
Meanwhile in still occupied..
No I didn't miss finland's in NATO now. It was part of my point, go back and read my post, there it is "(Finland 2023)". Demonstrating if Putin's goal was stopping NATO's encroachment then Putin is a failure. And Putin is not a failure.
Meanwhile in still occupied..