January 6th Hearings

[roller24]

I think the dems know that these indictments are thin on substance and most likely unconstitutional. They are playing a dangerous game.
If they convict him, they set the precedent for their own convictions as the Russian Collusion fraud meets every point of prosecution set forth in this indictment.

[ripper5]

I think the dems know that these indictments are thin on substance and most likely unconstitutional. They are playing a dangerous game.
If they convict him, they set the precedent for their own convictions as the Russian Collusion fraud meets every point of prosecution set forth in this indictment.

How do you know what they know? Jewish space lasors? Maybe you use the Trump mind meld to just magically read the dems' minds?

[roller24]

I don't know, which is why I began the sentence with "I think".
I see you've resorted to ridicule without one substantial thought.
Therefore, I think, and you don't.

[ripper5]

Trying to conflate your huntergate with this flagrant flaunting of our voting rights and laws deserves all ridicule it could get. Because it's ridiculous.

[roller24]

Best of luck.

Newly-appointed Special Counsel Jack Smith, tapped by Attorney General Merick Garland to investigate former President Donald Trump, has a history of botched prosecutions of leading political leaders.

flagrant flaunting
you sound like Sylvester the cat

I can almost feel the spray.

[ripper5]

You're projecting again, every single thing is met with projection from you guys.

[ripper5]

This host does the perfect Mark Levin impersonation. That's how I envision our magas sound. Although Levin is right Trump is toast.

[roller24]

where is my projection here?
I haven't made any accusations save you sounding all like a lisp impaired cat.

[roller24]

what do you call loud farts? Flagrant flatulations?

[roller24]

Both parties can be cited for projecting, so it's a mute point.