America’s “Long War” against Humanity

rSin · Post by **rSin** » Sun Apr 10, 2022 3:10 am

Video: Imperial Conquest: America’s “Long War” against Humanity

The following text was first presented at the Rosa Luxemburg Conference, Berlin, January 11, 2014. It was subsequently included in my book entitled The Globalization of War. America’s Long War against Humanity

The concept of the Long War is part of US military doctrine since the end of World War II. In many regards, todays wars are a continuation of the Second World War.

Worldwide militarization is also part of a global economic agenda, namely the application of the neoliberal economic policy model which has led to the impoverishment of large sectors of the World population.

***

https://www.globalresearch.ca/imperial- ... ty/5364215

Intrinsic · Post by **Intrinsic** » Sun Apr 10, 2022 11:12 am

Going in, seemed reasonable then further reading and listening red flags were thrown up. Went to the Global Research website science section. ohmigod! Conspiracy theories are not science. . Peer review papers, repeatable experiments, a consensus is science.

I am going to use ad hominem, rather than address the source. Sorry not sorry.

Rational Wiki on Globalresearch content
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Globalresearch

Wikipedia:

Michel Chossudovsky (born 1946) is a Canadian economist, author and conspiracy theorist.[1] He is professor emeritus of economics at the University of Ottawa[2][3] and the president and director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), which runs the website globalresearch.ca, founded in 2001, which publishes falsehoods and conspiracy theories.[4][5][6] Chossudovsky has promoted conspiracy theories about 9/11.

In 2017, the Centre for Research on Globalization was accused by information warfare specialists at NATO’s Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence (STRATCOM) of playing a key role in the spread of pro-Russian propaganda.[13] A report by the U.S. State Department in August 2020 accused the website of being a proxy for a Russian disinformation campaign.[14]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Chossudovsky

Chossudovsky is a big fan of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo.
'nuff said.

I apologize for biting at your heels lately ben. But these last two websites, vaccine.news, had lots of common links.
I fear you may have gone down a rabbit hole, in an echo chamber.

rSin · Post by **rSin** » Sun Apr 10, 2022 12:16 pm

their take on vaccines has little to do with there impecable take on history

and by bad vaccine science you mean anything that tells the factual side of the story that is being silenced...

Intrinsic · Post by **Intrinsic** » Sun Apr 10, 2022 1:21 pm

Agreed. I admmited it's an ad hominem fallacy.

As Rational wiki says.

While some of GlobalResearch's articles discuss legitimate humanitarian concerns, its view of science, economics, and geopolitics is conspiracist — if something goes wrong, the Jews West didit! The site has long been a crank magnet: If you disagree with "Western" sources on 9/11, or HAARP, or vaccines, or H1N1, or climate change, or anything published by the "mainstream" media, then GlobalResearch is guaranteed to have a page you will love.

My bad. it's just a bias I'm not willing to entertain.
It's an international poker game where everybody is cheating imo.

Intrinsic · Post by **Intrinsic** » Sun Apr 10, 2022 1:39 pm

No I mean no science. Conjecture at best. Science has procedure and consensus and verifiability. And peer review. When you look at the peer review on those articles (or their sources) then it becomes science.

Well I'm against opinion and conjecture and logical fallacies masquerading as science. It's a sin in my opinion. I'm okay with `em long as they don't masquerade.

I think that's reasonable.

rSin · Post by **rSin** » Sun Apr 10, 2022 6:05 pm

conjectures can reasonably assault science when they introduce just counters to points of evidence the sciences prerequisites got wrong

and when they are coupled with revealing this or that major interest shown to have supressed them

science will always prevail but
science isnt exclusively insisted in revealing bad science...

Intrinsic · Post by **Intrinsic** » Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:59 pm

I have nothing against conjectures as I said. I'm rather fond of them.

Actually science is kinda invested in itself, lately I have found numerous papers critiquing the peer-review process or finding failures in it. With strategies n recommendations improving correcting the process.