Anti-vaxx Chronicles

[Intrinsic]

Wat!?

So you can't or won't adress with the article roller posted from The Nation, The topic at hand.

So ya post up to POLITICAL videos with absolutely no point whatsoever.

I'll betcha cuz you can't argue the science. Or even know what science is. Or worse what scientific participation is. Clueless. Then you go run off claiming to leave it for others cuz you're too fucking stupid or a coward to defend whatever odd point you're trying to make. Explain it to me like I'm 5 years old what the post date has to do with the science.


If you don't know what I mean by complex proteins folding into receptors , just say I don't know. Sheesh Political videos. Whata maroon.

Matt Taibbie. Vs Kristian Andersen or Sergei Pond. MAGA TEARS

[roller24]

Even Andersen said that he felt the paper was released prematurely.

Kristian Andersen, who would end up being the lead author of “Proximal Origin,” also weighed in on February 8. “The fact that Wuhan became the epicenter of the ongoing epidemic caused by nCoV [novel coronavirus] is likely an unfortunate coincidence, but it raises questions that would be wrong to dismiss out of hand,” he wrote. “Our main work over the last couple of weeks has been focused on trying to disprove any type of lab theory, but we are at a crossroad where the scientific evidence isn’t conclusive enough to say that we have high confidence in any of the three main theories considered.”

“As to publishing this document in a journal,” he added, “I am currently not in favor of doing so. I believe that publishing something that is open-ended could backfire at this stage.” Andersen suggested that the scientists wait and collect more evidence so they could publish some “strong conclusive statements that are based on the best data we have access to. I don’t think we are there yet.”

What do you think he meant by "backfire"?

[Intrinsic]

What is that a trick question. Typical good scientific caution I'd say. Ultimately less than 2 months later "Andersen concluded that animals sold in a market in Wuhan, China, were most likely to be the source of the virus."
Those tell tale receptors in pangolins, one of the most trafficked mammals in the world.

What did you think he meant?

[roller24]

backfire like articles with headlines resembling

NIH E-mails Show Efforts to Rule Out a Lab Origin of Covid

also it seems to me they found pangolin data helpful but also not conclusive.

The pangolin data, it turned out, did not provide an explanation for the scientists’ central concerns about the furin cleavage site, and the viruses isolated from some pangolins were not 99 percent similar to SARS-CoV-2, but the data did show that coronaviruses circulating in pangolins shared other key features with the pandemic virus.

[roller24]

also I ran across this, study.
I did not fully read, but it seems to concur.

The presence of SARS-CoV-2-related viruses in Malayan pangolins, in silico analysis of the ACE2 receptor polymorphism and sequence similarities between the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of the spike proteins of pangolin and human Sarbecoviruses led to the proposal of pangolin as intermediary. However, the binding affinity of the pangolin ACE2 receptor for SARS-CoV-2 RBD was later on reported to be low. Here, we provide evidence that the pangolin is not the intermediate animal at the origin of the human pandemic. Moreover, data available do not fit with the spillover model currently proposed for zoonotic emergence which is thus unlikely to account for this outbreak.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7405773/

[Butcher Bob]

Hmm, found this just laying around too...

[Intrinsic]

^^Ahh nice! Jim Jordan embarrasses himself yet again.

[Butcher Bob]

Yeeah.....try watching the 6:03 that comes after Jim's :03.

[Intrinsic]

6:03 "What they did is not science"
Jordan embarrassing himself with the witnesses he chose.
There was no suppression, all hypothesis were examined. nobody was prevented from printing peer review papers.
MAGA tears

[Butcher Bob]

There was no suppression, all hypothesis were examined. nobody was prevented from printing peer review papers.

You and your crazy conspiracy theories.