But we have observe so little of the universe, hence why I wanted to give the explanation what a scientific fact is and why a 'proven scientific fact' is a mythical animal. I know I glossed over separating mathematical proof, from proof in the tangible world, sorry.
No I don't think so, when I say 3D I mean 3D, such as the study of knots ie topology, some knots exist in 3D but not all in any upper dimensions. Fwiw a mathematical definition of a dimension is its orthogonal to all other dimensions.
I don't think you're referring to time as a dimension. Mathematically it is the fourth dimension, if and only if you have only 4 dimensions but if you add more Dimensions, time as a dimension doesn't work. I don't think you were saying so but I just wanted to pointed ir out.
What is Time is whole nother tangent.. when you get an Insight let me know.
Interesting you note that the electromagnetic energy, photon, is evidence of another dimension. Very similar but more elegant than what I had given earlier, back in one of mmm threads. Although My favorite evidence is the electric and the Magnetic parts are orthogonal to each other in 3d ( with respect to time). Where is the Back EMF energy stored with an electrical coil. Not anywhere in our 3D. As far as I know can't be measured till released, only mathematically predicted.
Noting the Photon you have while traveling experiences zero time. Warning rambling: Time and space are proportional to each other. same as energy and matter are proportional. A personal observation of mine, nothing formal.
E=mc2. T= k*(Space or Einstein's manifold),
Note those are the formulas in 2d.
As in your observation with a photon, as speed increase to c, time goes to zero. What I'm still trying to work out is this implies when motion approaches zero, time should approaches infinite (or just exists more from our perspective) or some cosmological constant like c. The k in my space-time equation
Electro magnetic, Space Time, weak strong nuclear,
The Duality of the known forces All evidence of more dimensions.
Do You mean Pi diameters (2r).Can you actually disprove that all circles are made up of Pi radius? No you can't. Because you can't quantify Pi in the first instance. We still don't know what Pi is.
First, yes we know exactly what pi is, one of the most defined numbers. just cuz it can't be expressed as a ratio. It is well defined, there are a multitude of mathematical expressions quantifying it. Which is a beauty of mathematics, How certain numbers such as pi, e and i keep showing up in different disciplines.
It's just an irrational number, no mystery. You know irational means the number cannot be expressed as a ratio. Really no mystery.
Second, 'proving/disproving'. I don't think you understand my explanation above on expressing facts. Or I don't understand what you're trying to say.
And yes I can, mathematically. As a student of Methods and Proofs I have shown all circles follow the form: circumference equals pi diameters. C=2×r×pi ... beginners exercise..
..Mathematically, but in our corporeal reality because of quantum effects there are no true circles.
4 fun try to prove there are no integers between 1 and 2. Another beginners exercise.
Ok I noticed I'm still holding my spent pipe, I interesting post,