Thank you!!smokebreaks wrote:I think we're all in a better category than most
PDFs:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=b ... 5685973772" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Thank you!!smokebreaks wrote:I think we're all in a better category than most
No. I said because of your distrust of scientific consensus ( or as you just demonstrated jes don't understand) that knowledge would be pointless in your stated position.Butcher Bob wrote:So, are you saying that the folks that told us Roundup is safe for decades did not possess the credentials of a scientist?Intrinsic wrote: I was going to help you out by pointing out you're confusion between scientist, the scientific method and scientific consensus.
Confusing corporate shills for scientists.
Typical...when faced with views that do not coincide with your own, unable to comprehend rational thoughts outside your own framework, start using the hip catchphases to make yourself sound smart and in-the-know, instead of just stating what's on your mind. I haven't misrepresented anything, nor have I been misleading....I have given my view, and provided the reasoning for that view.Intrinsic wrote:No. I said because of your distrust of scientific consensus ( or as you just demonstrated jes don't understand) that knowledge would be pointless in your stated position.
Instead I asked a simple question that you dodged using your usual red herring and strawman fallacies.
...you've either got a word or two wrong, or you're missing a word or two...nothing after 'virus' makes sense as it exists.Intrinsic wrote:Exactly how can you be sure a lab created/manipulated Corona virus is even and the realm of possible?
They've been doing that shit for almost half a century....certainly they've gotten good at it by now...no?Intrinsic wrote:Exactly how can you be sure a lab created/manipulated Corona virus is even in the realm of possible?