Poll: Did Apollo missions go to the moon, or was it faked?
Poll: Did Apollo missions go to the moon, or was it fake
Buzz's behavior caused me to change my vote to No.
This too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcXJ2ifCC1Y" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcXJ2ifCC1Y" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Munchy
- Board Administrator
-
Karma Monster
- Custom Title: UnhingedMotherfucker
- Location: Getting Help
- Has bestowed Karma : 499 times
- Received Karma : 983 times
- Posts: 4002
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 1:55 am
Poll: Did Apollo missions go to the moon, or was it fake
quite good basic SSP:
Prohibition is Futile THC will be Assimilated
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ How To Pass Drug Tests ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one. -Albert Einstein
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ How To Pass Drug Tests ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one. -Albert Einstein
- Intrinsic
- Advanced Grower
-
Karma Hippie
- Has bestowed Karma : 1794 times
- Received Karma : 1578 times
- Posts: 7704
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:51 am
Poll: Did Apollo missions go to the moon, or was it fake
The "better be ready " vid, imparted no info whatsoever, i have no idea what you expected me to see or get from that about the fake moon landings or this secret space program (where do the resources come form minerals, fuel supplies, resources, they cantr come from htin air, evidence of resources dissappearing would have to exist, not to mention the people and there families, where are they, where do they retire)
A lot of vids there to watch, since i can only watch from this public computer (library) my time is limited.
And so i understand yer time constraints also ...
Any particular vids specifically with more then some personalities' conjuncture ( conjecture with using the scientific method and duplicable facts is OK). or is it all conjecture?
there must be something ya can cite instead of accumulating evidence, something that first cracked your believe,that made ya say .. Maybe.
A lot of vids there to watch, since i can only watch from this public computer (library) my time is limited.
And so i understand yer time constraints also ...
Any particular vids specifically with more then some personalities' conjuncture ( conjecture with using the scientific method and duplicable facts is OK). or is it all conjecture?
there must be something ya can cite instead of accumulating evidence, something that first cracked your believe,that made ya say .. Maybe.
- Intrinsic
- Advanced Grower
-
Karma Hippie
- Has bestowed Karma : 1794 times
- Received Karma : 1578 times
- Posts: 7704
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:51 am
Poll: Did Apollo missions go to the moon, or was it fake
https://www.scientificamerican.com/arti ... til-it-is/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
...
Any doubt or evidence the auhtor is wrong about no pics of ufos from astronomers, pro and armature, none from all the smartphones out there? anyone? if so where?
...
"Of course, military pilots aren’t the only ones with extensive experience looking at objects in the sky—and the "equipment to record what they see. Astronomers have that, too—yet they never seem to ever catch UFOs in the viewfinders of their telescopes. Similarly, the increasingly global ubiquity of smartphones should presumably boost the numbers and quality of UFO encounters captured on video (as they have done for rocket launches), but the flood of eerie footage has yet to materialize.
That raises a red flag for Bruce Macintosh, an astronomer at Stanford University. “In general, interesting physical phenomena are only barely significant when first detected. Then, as technology progresses, those detections become more significant,” he says. “But UFO detections have remained marginal for decades; they’ve just gone from being blurry shapes on film cameras to blurry shapes on the digital infrared sensors of fighter jet gun cameras. This, in spite of the fact that the world’s total imaging capacity has expanded by several orders of magnitude in the past 20 years.” To remain so vexingly residual, he says, UFOs would have to become more elusive in lockstep with our increasing ability to detect them—something no natural process would be expected to do.
Hypothetical aliens with advanced technology could do that, of course. “But then you have to ask why they would choose to remain marginally undetectable rather than just being undetectable,” Macintosh says. “Unless they’re taunting us, it’s hard to come up with a coherent explanation.”
Except, of course, for the obvious one: It’s never aliens. Until, perhaps, it is.
Any doubt or evidence the auhtor is wrong about no pics of ufos from astronomers, pro and armature, none from all the smartphones out there? anyone? if so where?
- Munchy
- Board Administrator
-
Karma Monster
- Custom Title: UnhingedMotherfucker
- Location: Getting Help
- Has bestowed Karma : 499 times
- Received Karma : 983 times
- Posts: 4002
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 1:55 am
Poll: Did Apollo missions go to the moon, or was it fake
Twelve Government Documents That Take UFOs Seriously:
https://www.richarddolanpress.com/twelv ... -documents" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.richarddolanpress.com/twelv ... -documents" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Prohibition is Futile THC will be Assimilated
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ How To Pass Drug Tests ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one. -Albert Einstein
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ How To Pass Drug Tests ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one. -Albert Einstein
- Intrinsic
- Advanced Grower
-
Karma Hippie
- Has bestowed Karma : 1794 times
- Received Karma : 1578 times
- Posts: 7704
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:51 am
Poll: Did Apollo missions go to the moon, or was it fake
Thanks, i view as i'm able to, and thanks for the written info.
it is not that i don't take UFO sightings seriously, just none, zero hard or soft evidence of spacecraft. Iknow it does not preclude the existence as space craft, just it doesn't advance it either. just there are Unidentified flying objects witnessed only. I keep looking for more evidence tho.
Why of all this UFO and/or secret space program to indicating the moon landings were faked. Why would you need a ssp to show fake landings?
Heck the the 100 odd Laser mirrors array is still there for armature and pro astronomers to reflect a laser and measure moon distance. How could ya fake that?
fwiw i watched the first moonwalk in real time in '69, with the rest of the world. .. fwiw
it is not that i don't take UFO sightings seriously, just none, zero hard or soft evidence of spacecraft. Iknow it does not preclude the existence as space craft, just it doesn't advance it either. just there are Unidentified flying objects witnessed only. I keep looking for more evidence tho.
Why of all this UFO and/or secret space program to indicating the moon landings were faked. Why would you need a ssp to show fake landings?
Heck the the 100 odd Laser mirrors array is still there for armature and pro astronomers to reflect a laser and measure moon distance. How could ya fake that?
fwiw i watched the first moonwalk in real time in '69, with the rest of the world. .. fwiw
- Intrinsic
- Advanced Grower
-
Karma Hippie
- Has bestowed Karma : 1794 times
- Received Karma : 1578 times
- Posts: 7704
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:51 am
Poll: Did Apollo missions go to the moon, or was it fake
What info is in this vid??Munchy wrote:quite good basic SSP:
drawings on photos, and blurry pixels of lights? Evidence or info of what??? conjecture?
Asking why someone put up a slide after joking about taking ET home. As if that is evidence he knows something secret.
of coarse action/reaction rockets engines can't make it to the stars. DUH! as if that is evidence it must exist at all. talk about begging the question. fuk science fiction does better science then this.
And faking the whole thing by not giving a shred of evidence or even hearsay or talking about at all about the 'new technology' it promotes in the byline.
What it is? What does it do? Not a freaking thing!
This is a good vid? really?
Online
- Lrus007
- Advanced Grower
-
Karma Bhudda
- Custom Title: hash and oil maker
- Has bestowed Karma : 1113 times
- Received Karma : 1742 times
- Posts: 2943
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:21 pm
Poll: Did Apollo missions go to the moon, or was it fake
i agree with intrinsic to many vids i do not want to watch.
i did watch a few. lets say you link only 2-3 pro and 2-3 con.
that would help a lot. then the reflectors on the moon
could have been put there by machine not a man.
thanks Lrus007
i did watch a few. lets say you link only 2-3 pro and 2-3 con.
that would help a lot. then the reflectors on the moon
could have been put there by machine not a man.
thanks Lrus007
My therapist says I am a habitual liar and an attention seeker, therefore nothing I say/write is true and under no circumstances should I be believed nor held accountable for anything I say. all photo's are paintings
People are born with the instinct to fight against their own death, to struggle with their last breath against even the most unavoidable and uncompromising ends.
People are born with the instinct to fight against their own death, to struggle with their last breath against even the most unavoidable and uncompromising ends.
- Intrinsic
- Advanced Grower
-
Karma Hippie
- Has bestowed Karma : 1794 times
- Received Karma : 1578 times
- Posts: 7704
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:51 am
Poll: Did Apollo missions go to the moon, or was it fake
True, lrus. Could have been if enough robotic tech existed back in the 60's. yet No micro-processors.
Wait! We had Machines to take a manned payload to the moon (apollo rockets) but instead sent a robot to fake it with the building of the mirror array, why not just not build the array at all? it's absence wouldn't if be missed. seems unnecessary step to pull a scam.
Yet it is possible. If we could put a man on the moon. it's possible.
I would think a machine doing that in '69 would be almost a triumphant as a moon walk. fer sure.
I agree with lrus on pro and con. alternate hypothesis's is fundamental to research.
Wait! We had Machines to take a manned payload to the moon (apollo rockets) but instead sent a robot to fake it with the building of the mirror array, why not just not build the array at all? it's absence wouldn't if be missed. seems unnecessary step to pull a scam.
Yet it is possible. If we could put a man on the moon. it's possible.
I would think a machine doing that in '69 would be almost a triumphant as a moon walk. fer sure.
I agree with lrus on pro and con. alternate hypothesis's is fundamental to research.
-
- MPG Ambassador
-
Karma Hippie
- Custom Title: eye the witch Melancholy
- Location: socal
- Has bestowed Karma : 33 times
- Received Karma : 28 times
- Posts: 17529
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 1:38 pm
Poll: Did Apollo missions go to the moon, or was it fake
boom
we landed
ive been in that minute
and that capuule is now happening
from what I gather there was o 90 window threer there that moment when they had the minute to orbit or not
we landed
ive been in that minute
and that capuule is now happening
from what I gather there was o 90 window threer there that moment when they had the minute to orbit or not
"we must strive to become good ancestors" nader
https://www.myplanetganja.com/viewforum.php?f=48
FUCK jimmydorecomedy.com
https://www.myplanetganja.com/viewforum.php?f=48
FUCK jimmydorecomedy.com