forbidden archeology

[bentech]

Workers at the Coronado Historic Site are digging through packets and packets of history. The site is named after the 16th-century Spanish explorer Francisco Vazquez de Coronado. It's rumored that he traveled through the area in search of the Seven Cities of Gold in northern New Mexico, but they never had proof he was here, until now.

https://www.krqe.com/news/albuquerque-m ... 1592135684" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

have always found that aluminum casting particularly impressive...

These Baffling Artifacts Prove How Little We Know About History

https://theravenreport.com/2016/12/06/t ... t-history/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[bentech]

a very compelling treatment of the lost south African civilization which built over a million stone complex's

id never heard the story about the train load of 'british' gold that disappeared there in the 1800's



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THONUYzbl7U" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[deran]

some scientists put some zeros too much to the result
or
some scientists put not enough zeros to the result

anyways, the only thing that cranks me up is this creationists picture of jesus riding a t-rex, till some days ago i could laugh about it, now i cant anymore ...

Carbon-14-dated dinosaur bones are less than 40,000 years old
Researchers have found a reason for the puzzling survival of soft tissue and collagen in dinosaur bones - the bones are younger than anyone ever guessed. Carbon-14 (C-14) dating of multiple samples of bone from 8 dinosaurs found in Texas, Alaska, Colorado, and Montana revealed that they are only 22,000 to 39,000 years old.

Members of the Paleochronology group presented their findings at the 2012 Western Pacific Geophysics Meeting in Singapore, August 13-17, a conference of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) and the Asia Oceania Geosciences Society (AOGS).

Since dinosaurs are thought to be over 65 million years old, the news is stunning - and more than some can tolerate. After the AOGS-AGU conference in Singapore, the abstract was removed from the conference website by two chairmen because they could not accept the findings. Unwilling to challenge the data openly, they erased the report from public view without a word to the authors. When the authors inquired, they received this letter:

..............................

http://newgeology.us/presentation48.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


this is really bad news to all that matters, the ones that control the past also control the future, and i see it everyday being "re-written" by higher powers ... like, they started to call my country of birth "west-balkans" , never ever in the history of this region there was a name like that beeing used publically, now its clear, that its only a big manipulation for the next generation to "learn" something like ... yeah its west, its europe, dividae et imperae at its simplest, and still most are too dumb and too blind to see ...

anyways ...

one thing bothers me, if you take the half life of c14 you have to wonder how would u use this method for probes that are to be expected 40000000 years old, bc if i know the half life of c14, i would know that there cant be any c14 left in so old organic probes, c14 is ideal up to an age of max 12000 years, and its impossible to meter organics that or millions old, bc there will be no c14 in it, you need other methods for chemical and physical analysis of time when working in this time frames
so, when you know, you cant use a fever thermometer for meassuring molten lead, how is it possible that they despite that had not one, but 2 confirmed successful readings , bc 2 different laboratories gave the same results, and went lucky with it

this makes no sense

and finally , this is one of the rare moments where my prehistoric university studies payed off for me personally :D just bc of this simple, wide spread "common" knowledge , like many heard c14 , but most have no real in depth clue , especially when you know also of at least 2 or better said 4 types of c14 methods, like native, calibrated, re calibrated and linked ... all will give different dates, but not in the size of 40.000 -> 40.000.000 , 3 digits, thats a factor of thousand, thats not acceptable for any kind of so called science , especially not one that defines us , our history, our evolution or what not

[bentech]

there are so many other ways to date things that allow accuracy deep into the past after carbon stops changing

you can examine crystals in sand and know how long ago they were last exposed to sunlight
you can examine isotopes on the surface of rocks and know how long they have been getting sunlight
you can examine the buildups which through various means grow overtop ancient writings and carvings

c14 is just a tool among many

[bentech]

Identification of previously dated reversals of Earth’s magnetic field recorded in the soil and estimates of the time since sediment had been buried provided ages of around 2.4 million years for the lower layer and about 1.9 million years for the upper layer.

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/anc ... abia-early" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[dill786]

^ wow thats mad

scary too if it happened again......

[bentech]

ancient britians mega tsunami

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EPNZWBk7i8" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[bentech]

this guys good

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7H1-9SMVxVI" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[bentech]

Ancient China the Forbidden History You Were Never Mean't to See

outstanding

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBbNKpd4NcE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[bentech]

another good one

What the Knights Templar Found Under Solomons Temple is Truly Bizarre
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmW_kkRIBHQ" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;