Page 26 of 101
Tokalot VI
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 5:56 pm
by MadMoonMan
oops sorry... maybe my bad.
Tokalot VI
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 7:08 pm
by bentech
google anonymous...
startpage.com
Tokalot VI
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:59 pm
by deran
bentech wrote:google anonymous...
startpage.com
better late than never
i mean
you are just 19 years behind time , when startpage/IxQuick was the next new thing around the corner
lol
Tokalot VI
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 11:38 am
by bentech
50 plus little peanut shapped characters on the back of a box of corn pops
all gold except for one brown one
who just happens to be pushing a mop?
fucking kelloggs...
Tokalot VI
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 1:46 pm
by bentech
hey deran
I miss auto-complete in the search box
anyway to get it using startpage?
Tokalot VI
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:59 pm
by deran
hey ben
as far as i know, that shouldnt be possible, bc of the anonymity
actually all your searches are copied in googles cache, the cookie google places into your browser recognizes you as the user with that named cache
startpage has another cookie policy and therefore searches arent stored, furthermore if this would work, every user of startpage would have search-auto-complete of all users before him, so if the user before you was looking for pants, oants would show up in your auto complete, tho you never searched for it ...
hope that helps a bit
Tokalot VI
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:07 pm
by deran
me and my tooth are best buddies
therefore i put it into a glass case where everyone can watch it
but
i have to get some antibiotics bc of the inflammatory possibilities
i wonder how im gonna manage that without money, as im on a limited health program .. bc i ow the state some 5 grands ... 5 grands for health ... which i never used ...
i hate this life
Tokalot VI
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:27 pm
by bentech
us poor people here in the states go to the pet store for anti-biotics when we need them
skip the doctor and prescription
Tokalot VI
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2017 9:34 pm
by bentech
DSLReports that Verizon sent a letter and white paper last week to the FCC, insisting that "the FCC has ample authority to pre-empt state efforts to protect consumer privacy, and should act to prevent states from doing so." Verizon's letter reads in part: "Allowing every State and locality to chart its own course for regulating broadband is a recipe for disaster. It would impose localized and likely inconsistent burdens on an inherently interstate service, would drive up costs, and would frustrate federal efforts to encourage investment and deployment by restoring the free market that long characterized Internet access service." From the report:
But there's several things Verizon is ignoring here. One being that the only reason states are trying to pass privacy laws is because Verizon lobbyists convinced former Verizon lawyer and FCC boss Ajit Pai that it was a good idea to kill the FCC's relatively modest rules. It's also worth noting that ISPs like Verizon (and the lawmakers paid to love them) have cried about protecting "states rights" when states try to pass protectionist laws hamstringing competitors, but in this case appears eager to trample those same state rights should states actually try and protect consumers. Verizon makes it abundantly clear it's also worried that when the FCC votes to kill net neutrality rules later this year, states will similarly try to pass their own rules protecting consumers, something Verizon clearly doesn't want. "States and localities have given strong indications that they are prepared to take a similar approach to net neutrality laws if they are dissatisfied with the result of the Restoring Internet Freedom proceeding," complains Verizon, again ignoring that its lawsuits are the reason that's happening.
https://www.dslreports.com/r0/download/ ... 20laws.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Veri ... acy-140625" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Tokalot VI
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 5:20 pm
by bentech
yep...