Pres. Never Re-Elected W/Unemployment Above 7.2%-CBO Says 8%

[WhiteHotAfterburner]

President has never been re-elected with unemployment above 7.2% in the modern era...

2004, Bush(R): 5.4%
1996, Clinton(D): 5.4%
1984, Reagan(R): 7.2%
1972, Nixon(R): 5.3%
1964, Johnson(D): 4.8%
1956, Eisenhowr(R): 4.3%
1948, Truman(D): 3.8%

CBO estimates that unemployment will remain above 8 percent until 2012...with not much hope of it falling below that before November...

,
WHAB

[bubbabush]

No surprise that you're, yet again, so full of shit anal blister. FDR was re-elected twice while the last retugklan caused depression still lingered with unemployment at:

1936: 16.9%

1940: 14.6%

and once more again in '44 during WWII with essentially zero unemployment.

~O~

[WhiteHotAfterburner]

No surprise that you're, yet again, so full of shit anal blister. FDR was re-elected twice while the last retugklan caused depression still lingered with unemployment at:

1936: 16.9%

1940: 14.6%

and once more again in '44 during WWII with essentially zero unemployment.

~O~

You post a thread averring Republicans are going to "Kill Medicare" when it's anything but, and I'm "full of shit"?



Dude (that is Dupe), you're nothing but lies, deceptions and delusions--replete indeed

As for your other drivel, I guess I have to hold your hand and walk you through it--AGAIN--Dupe...

"...in the modern era..."

Obama Kool Aid Man.jpg (24.32 KiB) Viewed 1841 times

Elitist 04.jpg (8.97 KiB) Viewed 1841 times

Done in One.jpg (16.01 KiB) Viewed 1841 times

,
WHAB

[ben ttech]

hey whab?

how much you gotta drink a day, for that to make prefect sense???

[Maribou Stork]

Without a definition of "modern era" being given, it is perfectly reasonable to include examples from '30s and '40s.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_history" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

modern era, describes the historical timeline after the Middle Ages.

It was the losing of his mind that caused the voters to turn away from Reagan.

[ben ttech]

wasnt the middle ages when the muslims and africans had to preserve the fine arts and sciences on account of the white people deciding to try cannabilism and living in hovels eating rats for several centuries???

[WhiteHotAfterburner]

Without a definition of "modern era" being given, it is perfectly reasonable to include examples from '30s and '40s.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_history" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

modern era, describes the historical timeline after the Middle Ages.

Oh yeah, it makes perfect sense I'd be talking about the "Middle Ages" when referring to the American "Modern Era" elections.

Why don't you post up the American election results from the "Middle Ages", please!

Colonial America (1492-1763)
Revolutionary Period (1764-1789)
The New Nation (1790-1828)
Western Expansion & Reform (1829-1859)
Civil War (1860-1865)
Reconstruction (1866-1877)
Gilded Age (1878-1889)
Progressive Era (1890-1913)
Great War & Jazz Age (1914-1928)
Depression & WWII (1929-1945)
Modern Era (1946 - present)

http://www.americaslibrary.gov/jb/index.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I suppose I should have specified the American Modern Era when discussing American elections?

,
WHAB

[WhiteHotAfterburner]

A more perfect metaphor for TOTUS' presidency is hard to find...today...



It's bottomed out! It's high-sided! It's run out of steam! It's hit a brick wall!

Care to list any of your own?





,
WHAB

[bubbabush]

Yeah anal-blister, you know your name; and that you're the most reliably full of shit commentator on the ganja-net. Get caught wrong and you'd rather fling a blatant excuse than act a man and fess up. Thanks for yet another example of just how big a piece of shit you are - you really are a snotty anal blister.

~O~

[ben ttech]

youd think some pro obama organizer would have snapped his ass up and put him to work organizing this season...