Reviewed the paper, I didn't find was any lab work, citations or experiments to verify thier hypothesis.
What we find in the actual publication is the only source of data is the CDC VARES raw data.
Conclusions based on known Unverified data. Holy shit! That's it, no experiments, no lab work, no verification, just vares. Holy shit batman.
Example
Table 4. Number of symptoms reported in VAERS,. restricted to the US population, for the year 2021, for various specific types of thrombosis, showing total counts for COVID-19 vaccines and for all vaccines. Pulmonary embolism, a highly related symptom, is also shown.
VARES is for reporting, anybody can report anything it's not verified it's not checked.
To use unverified data from vares, or anything, for evidence of anything is bullshit. I mean is not science
So what the fuc is going on here, using unverified data and trying to pawn it off a science??
Since there was no or peer review, in supposedly peer reviewed publication, I looked at the authors, first two and has been critique unfavorably for previous work outside their field.
One Has long been established and critiqued as a purveyor of misinformation. 3 are not qualified in cellular mechanics at all.
Kyriakopoulosc was the only one that had any qualifications for this type of paper on cellular mechanics.
This is not new. Charlatans been using VARES as scare tatics for awhile, this is just wrapped up in a pretty package.