Ah. So liquid absorption of gases has nothing to do with the amount of gases they come in contact with, correct? Nor are those same liquids affected by temperature changes caused by atmospheric warming conditions produced by the same gases which provide a feedback loop, correct?Dick Fein wrote:The water temperature dictates how much co2 the oceans can absorb, okay? They have warm periods and cool periods. El Nino and La Nina, Capiche?
I guess, using Climate Denialist Potato Logic, that means we can continue to pump as much CO2 into the atmosphere as we like, as the oceans will absorb ever-increasing amounts of CO2 as they continue to cool (cooler liquids being able to absorb more gasses than warmer liquids) . . .
. . . Except oceans temperatures are rising. And so are atmospheric CO2 levels. So your Climate Denialist Potato Logic doesn't seem to be all that logical after all. It would be the opposite of what is currently happening.
Because if Climate Denialist Potato Logic was indeed "logical", temperatures would not continue to rise over time, and no would CO2 build-up in the atmosphere.
The Climate Denialist Potato Logic Trump Card is, of course, that none of these things are really happening. Ocean temperatures are not rising, and neither are CO2 levels.
It's all a conspiracy to steal our potatoes!