Global warming hoax is Eugenics 2.0
Global warming hoax is Eugenics 2.0
Are you fucking serious? Or just doubling down on stupid?
If the world is round then Pi must appear in the calculations. Put it wherever you want but it must be there.
I told you privately how I feel about your contribution to this thread, do you want to make it public?
If the world is round then Pi must appear in the calculations. Put it wherever you want but it must be there.
I told you privately how I feel about your contribution to this thread, do you want to make it public?
- ben ttech
- MPG Ambassador
-
Karma Hippie
- Custom Title: godisnotwhite.com
- Has bestowed Karma : 400 times
- Received Karma : 249 times
- Posts: 8248
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 2:22 am
Global warming hoax is Eugenics 2.0
dick
your trying to float rubbish
anywhere nobodies doing math
or that cheese dick bob is checking it
its rubbish
I don't use pi
when it im calculation gases
I use pie when it relevant to what im doing
what the fuck are you doing?????????
your trying to float rubbish
anywhere nobodies doing math
or that cheese dick bob is checking it
its rubbish
I don't use pi
when it im calculation gases
I use pie when it relevant to what im doing
what the fuck are you doing?????????
"disaster is the mother of necessity" rSin
- rSin
- Karma Hippie
- Custom Title: world where everone gets
- Location: neck deep
- Has bestowed Karma : 1668 times
- Received Karma : 1063 times
- Posts: 7295
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 8:12 pm
Global warming hoax is Eugenics 2.0
ok
fuck this really hurts
there is a mathematical element
in what your contesting
I mean the mistake your sure your revealing
which is incorrect
could QUICKLY be addressed
and the dismissal of pi
would quickly reveal
please
show us the work...
fuck this really hurts
there is a mathematical element
in what your contesting
I mean the mistake your sure your revealing
which is incorrect
could QUICKLY be addressed
and the dismissal of pi
would quickly reveal
please
show us the work...
the intolerance of the old order is emerging from the rosy mist in which it has hitherto been obscured.
Online
" You must be only reading the comments again because it is revealed within the first minute. Do me a favor and don't read any more of my posts. I don't need to convince you of anything."
Whatever it's my nature, ya post nonsense i'm going call ya on it. m'kay? fwiw i never saw the comments. jes the yahoo's con job.
Fwiw, yanno pi was derived from the ratios of angles and sides of triangles (trigonometry). as for the number of diameters in a circle's circumstance it was derived later with pythagorean theorem using right angle triangles. but there are many more ways to derive pi. it shows up all over the place.
That the Beauty of math, how no matter what perspective ya start with the results are the same.
for instance this equation has no pi explicitly listed,
f(x) = sin(x) - x*cos(x)
yet with the trig functions of sine and cosine it is intrinsically in there. Cool huh?
That's irrational , i crack myself up (if i need to explain ...pi is an irrational number)
- Intrinsic
- Advanced Grower
-
Karma Hippie
- Has bestowed Karma : 1794 times
- Received Karma : 1578 times
- Posts: 7704
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:51 am
Global warming hoax is Eugenics 2.0
Sure, i didn't see why it was private to start with. Here it is:Dick Fein wrote:Are you fucking serious? Or just doubling down on stupid?
If the world is round then Pi must appear in the calculations. Put it wherever you want but it must be there.
I told you privately how I feel about your contribution to this thread, do you want to make it public?
" You must be only reading the comments again because it is revealed within the first minute. Do me a favor and don't read any more of my posts. I don't need to convince you of anything."
Whatever it's my nature, ya post nonsense i'm going call ya on it. m'kay? fwiw i never saw the comments. jes the yahoo's con job.
Fwiw, yanno pi was derived from the ratios of angles and sides of triangles (trigonometry). as for the number of diameters in a circle's circumstance it was derived later with pythagorean theorem using right angle triangles. but there are many more ways to derive pi. it shows up all over the place.
That the Beauty of math, how no matter what perspective ya start with the results are the same.
for instance this equation has no pi explicitly listed,
f(x) = sin(x) - x*cos(x)
yet with the trig functions of sine and cosine it is intrinsically in there. Cool huh?
That's irrational , i crack myself up (if i need to explain ...pi is an irrational number)
Last edited by Intrinsic on Fri Aug 23, 2019 4:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Online
- Intrinsic
- Advanced Grower
-
Karma Hippie
- Has bestowed Karma : 1794 times
- Received Karma : 1578 times
- Posts: 7704
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:51 am
Global warming hoax is Eugenics 2.0
But again what equation? Since the thread is about Global warming, (That is the mean average surface temperature of earth)
then the "equations" in question would be for averaging temperatures. I reiterate:
then the "equations" in question would be for averaging temperatures. I reiterate:
For mean average temperatures. (Global Warming) its just summation of data points (temps) and averaged out.
- Sally
- good karma
- Has bestowed Karma : 58 times
- Received Karma : 54 times
- Posts: 216
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 11:00 am
Global warming hoax is Eugenics 2.0
Oh boy! ♫♪ ♫♪ This is fun. I love geometry
The equation for a centered circle is, where x and y are Cartesian coordinates and r is the radius length.
x² + y² = r²
No pi for needed to graph or solve for a circle. Lovely
The equation for a centered circle is, where x and y are Cartesian coordinates and r is the radius length.
x² + y² = r²
No pi for needed to graph or solve for a circle. Lovely
“a mathematician who is not also something of a poet will never be a perfect mathematician.” ~ Karl Weierstrass
- Jesús Malverde
- Site Moderator
-
Karma Bhudda
- Custom Title: Munchy Sock since OG lol
- Has bestowed Karma : 71 times
- Received Karma : 131 times
- Posts: 2469
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 6:59 pm
Global warming hoax is Eugenics 2.0
Teen Barbie repeats (in squeaky, whiny voice): "Math class is tough!"
You cannot help someone who is willfully—even proudly—innumerate.
You cannot help someone who is willfully—even proudly—innumerate.
One for the rook
One for the crow
One to rot
and one to grow
One for the crow
One to rot
and one to grow
- rSin
- Karma Hippie
- Custom Title: world where everone gets
- Location: neck deep
- Has bestowed Karma : 1668 times
- Received Karma : 1063 times
- Posts: 7295
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 8:12 pm
Global warming hoax is Eugenics 2.0
innumerate!!!
wonder which of the two ways ive got to pronounce that
is correct...
wonder which of the two ways ive got to pronounce that
is correct...
the intolerance of the old order is emerging from the rosy mist in which it has hitherto been obscured.
- rSin
- Karma Hippie
- Custom Title: world where everone gets
- Location: neck deep
- Has bestowed Karma : 1668 times
- Received Karma : 1063 times
- Posts: 7295
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 8:12 pm
Global warming hoax is Eugenics 2.0
rit or rate?
the intolerance of the old order is emerging from the rosy mist in which it has hitherto been obscured.
Online
So now you are using the do-nothing argument that you were using in this thread to claim : no one really believes in global warming, greenhouse gas emissions, the grade school math, potential climate change.
As evidence since I or no one is doing anything about it so agw must not be real.
Just to keep the Commander in denial in office to the next election. So he can deny one more time.
Who knows what butcher Bob believes? Is he Bullshiting or is he in denial too.
- Intrinsic
- Advanced Grower
-
Karma Hippie
- Has bestowed Karma : 1794 times
- Received Karma : 1578 times
- Posts: 7704
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 10:51 am
Global warming hoax is Eugenics 2.0
I assume you're * means degrees Celsius. And not times Right?Butcher Bob wrote: - And to top it off, Greta tells world leaders at COP25 'You're not fukking listening!', as we learn that not only are we not going to meet the ideal goal of only a 1.5* increase by 2100, nor the acceptable goal of 2*, nor the threshold limit of 3*, but the new studies indicate a projection of an 8* increase by 2100.
So now you are using the do-nothing argument that you were using in this thread to claim : no one really believes in global warming, greenhouse gas emissions, the grade school math, potential climate change.
As evidence since I or no one is doing anything about it so agw must not be real.
Just to keep the Commander in denial in office to the next election. So he can deny one more time.
Who knows what butcher Bob believes? Is he Bullshiting or is he in denial too.