Global warming hoax is Eugenics 2.0

[Dick Fein]

Great so you are finally going to put up some proof , no more pussy around with shepple utube but some real solid evidence, yanno math or facts not opinion.

I will try again. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.00165.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Prawn Connery]

Great so you are finally going to put up some proof , no more pussy around with shepple utube but some real solid evidence, yanno math or facts not opinion.

I will try again. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.00165.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

LOL! You're going to have to try better than another non-peer reviewed paper by employees of the petro dollar. Or do I detect a theme?

The best thing about that tripe is the rebuttal is longer than the original paper itself!

https://climatefeedback.org/claimreview ... l-warming/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Prawn Connery]

Still can't substantiate your claim, eh Prawn?

Haha! Still trying to build your strawmen, eh Bob? It must be hard trying to build a strawman when all you see are the needles in the haystack . . . and not the hay itself

So I did you a favour and gathered a few straws of evidence to read. Don't worry Bob, no-one expects you to actually read any of this. A man must know his limits, after all.

Things are getting a bit prickly around here . . .

https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/waterrig ... WR-734.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

https://www.nationalgeographic.org/ency ... dead-zone/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

https://aem.asm.org/content/aem/37/5/820.full.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

https://theconversation.com/how-is-oxyg ... ays-109795" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

https://slate.com/technology/2014/07/th ... ction.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.eniscuola.net/en/2016/11/03/ ... d-control/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

https://www.chinadialogue.net/article/s ... quaculture" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Butcher Bob]

https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/waterrig ... WR-734.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

https://www.nationalgeographic.org/ency ... dead-zone/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

https://aem.asm.org/content/aem/37/5/820.full.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

https://theconversation.com/how-is-oxyg ... ays-109795" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

https://slate.com/technology/2014/07/th ... ction.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.eniscuola.net/en/2016/11/03/ ... d-control/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

https://www.chinadialogue.net/article/s ... quaculture" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

See lots of information on toxicity, and oxygen depletion within the water, but nothing to support your claim:

"...the anaerobic bacteria that break algae down when they die, releasing huge amounts of CO2 into the water."
"...going to release CO2 on a massive scale."

Perhaps I missed it, and you could point out specifically where they support your claim.

[Prawn Connery]

Perhaps you should learn to read for yourself? Or do you have other people hold your dick while you piss, too?

There is plenty of evidence - not just in those links, but in all the others I have provided. Indeed, there is a whole internet explaining the biological processes of algal blooms and decay. It is not really my problem that you are incapable of learning for yourself, or deliberately ignoring the established facts. Given you didn't even know cyanobacteria are anaerobic, it is probably the former.

However, if I were to give you the benefit of the doubt that you're just being obtuse to further an argument, then I'm afraid you'll have to find another subject to rile me - because I'm bored with your ineptitude. Faux or otherwise.

[Intrinsic]

Great so you are finally going to put up some proof , no more pussy around with shepple utube but some real solid evidence, yanno math or facts not opinion.

I will try again. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.00165.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Thanks for the link, thanks for the math. sorry it didn't pan out better. I agree with most of the critique from prawns link . Certainly they will never even attempt to publish it.

tho they agree with your stance of totally regecting
co2 as planetary greenhouse gas; that is only what makes their math work. except they backtrack somewhat and place co2 not-totally responsible for AGW, but only at a .01% contribution.

Please note. Kauppinen et al don't contest Global Warming (GW). They depended upon it in their hypothesis..

Edit: spelling error

[rSin]

Isnt that like the math which
Called it an 'act of god'
When that drunk mom
Drove her family off the cliff

And the ocean and gravity finished
Them off?

[Butcher Bob]

I read plenty Prawn, which is why I know your statements...

"...the anaerobic bacteria that break algae down when they die, releasing huge amounts of CO2 into the water."
"...going to release CO2 on a massive scale."

...are full of shit. Not only do your sources not support your claim, one of them actually supported the opposite...

"Several HAB species and/or strains respond to increased CO2 concentrations with increases in growth rate..."

In fact, the scientific community is looking at concentrating the process to sequester carbon in order to save us from this supposed GW...

Ocean Algae Can Evolve Fast to Tackle Climate Change

How Cyanobacteria Could Help Save the Planet

How algae could sustainably reduce the carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere

Algae May be Key to Combating Climate Change

Algae to Combat Climate Change: The Pond Story, Chapter 1

Algae-Based Carbon Sequestration

New Tech Could Turn Algae Into the Climate’s Slimy Savior

Lowering Carbon with Algae

Duke researchers find that algae could be used to combat climate change

Algae: The ‘Greenest’ Solution to Climate Change?

And guess what, I'm totally on board with that solution. Not because I'm convinced that man has caused GW, but rather because I prefer oxygen rich air, i.e. less pollution.

But you would have us believe mother nature doesn't know what she's doing...making claims you can not substantiate, when there is clear evidence to the contrary.

This is the behavior of a sheep...when hit in the head with a wrench thrown by a monkey.

[rSin]

Did you see it?
Did you listen?!?!

Them are the FUCKS on the job
Sing your tune...

There is an EARY way the bad from
The good
In this debate

Just look at whos position
When the lights come up

Has afforded them a spendy new sedan
A second estate

And the yatch of course

As opposed to the other side

Who only got fire for making
Their work public

That and the scarlet letter
At each next interview

Its easy to see then...

[Dick Fein]

Instant karma is my favorite kind.
The IPCC's climate models are based on a flat earth model.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgdTzR_aK0o" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
You can't see it but I am doing a little victory dance here.