What strains are you running?

Perhaps you should learn to read for yourself? Or do you have other people hold your dick while you piss, too? :roll: There is plenty of evidence - not just in those links, but in all the others I have provided. Indeed, there is a whole internet explaining the biological processes of algal blooms an...

Still can't substantiate your claim, eh Prawn? Haha! Still trying to build your strawmen, eh Bob? It must be hard trying to build a strawman when all you see are the needles in the haystack . . . and not the hay itself :winky: So I did you a favour and gathered a few straws of evidence to read. Don...

Great so you are finally going to put up some proof , no more pussy around with shepple utube but some real solid evidence, yanno math or facts not opinion. I will try again. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.00165.pdf LOL! You're going to have to try better than another non-peer reviewed paper by employe...

Butcher Bob wrote:Take a cue from Intrinsic, use data and sources to support your point. Because your name calling and belittlement just make you look like a child.

BTW mate, this is the only remnant of the old Shark Tank we've got left - you can't expect me to go easy on you!

You know an online debate has turned to shit when it degenerates into a bunch of parsing quotes.

This is why debating you is an exercise in futility....because your reading comprehension is for shit. I specifically qualified that you made no mention of the "97%". In fact, you used the term "ALL"...which I displayed when I quoted your post. :roll: "ALL" what? Which...

So...no substantiation, eh. I couldn't recall who mentioned it first, so I went back and looked. While the specific % wasn't mentioned, it was Prawn who made the first claim... But I do thank you Intrinsic for clearing up what the number actually refers to...I learned something. However, it would s...

Lrus007 wrote:i was hoping it was going to be funny,
oh well

I'm sorry. It's very Australia-centric. But I thought you might at least have a chuckle about the fish.

I'm not making that claim...I am pointing to the fact that scientists do not see a CO2 problem with the bacteria. So, I guess we should ask Prawn to substantiate his claim... "...the anaerobic bacteria that break algae down when they die, releasing huge amounts of CO2 into the water." &qu...

But here is an instance where scientists are using a bacteria you claim causes massive CO2 release. And it's not a small scale plan...they are saying it will REVOLUTIONIZE how the WORLD treats it's waste water. So, who's wrong?...you, or those scientists? Now I'm not making a judgement as to the an...

>>>so what makes you think that small scale use of the bacteria won't make it into the big picture? Arn’t we talking about bacteria that are already abundant and thrive in nature..? Yes, we are. Which is why I still don't know what the fuck Bob is trying to prove - or "disprove" as he cla...

Pointing out that the smart science guys are developing use of the bacteria supports that they are not concerned with CO2 production from it's use....otherwise these 97% would never even consider such a practice, would they??? Mate, we're talking small-scale use of anaerobic bacteria to treat waste...

Counter to your CO2 argument... That's what I'm trying to figure out. How is this counter to my CO2 argument? It actually reinforces my argument. You are proving my point. Which is why I asked what point you were trying to make - because it's not counter to mine. Are you saying the algae are going ...

That's nice to know, but I'm still not sure what point it is you're trying to make. Perhaps you can spell it out for me.